China Legal Blog
Aggregated China Law Information
Jeremy Hunt’s Autumn Statement is about putting pressure on Labour
Aggregated Source: ChinaLegalBlog.com
MediaIntel.Asia

Photo by STEFAN ROUSSEAU/POOL/AFP via Getty Images
The last time Jeremy Hunt rose to the despatch box to deliver an Autumn Statement he dismantled Liz Truss’s cavalier plans to cut tax to grow the economy. She sat on the front bench placid as her political eulogy was read. Hunt’s speech triggered the party’s descent from panic to mania to despair. It indicated the return to where it all began back in 2010: fiscal conservatism, austerity, light-touch regulation and a reverence for the private sector.
This was the Conservative Party in action: driving in circles, searching for what it believes. And now, this autumn of incoherence is the latest act of indecision. I’m convinced one of the reasons that the Conservatives’ support has withered away is their flip-flopping over the past 13 years.
David Cameron’s return to front-line politics exemplifies this circularity. But there are other instances too. Boris Johnson was partly elected to rehire 20,000 police officers that were scrapped under Cameron. The current prime minister wants to cut the tax burden that he himself raised. The China sceptics want to reverse a policy towards the Chinese Communist Party that was instituted by the coalition. Rishi Sunak sought to rebuild relations with the EU trashed by his predecessors, and he cancelled HS2 despite it being championed and funded by successive Conservative governments.
Sunak is left trying to construct a story out of a pick ’n’ mix of political projects, none of which achieved their stated plans. The deficit didn’t disappear (although it did fall); the country wasn’t levelled up; tax cuts didn’t fuel growth.
Related
The question, then, for today is whether this will really be a tax-cutting, or even a fiscally conservative, Autumn Statement. Will the tax burden overall actually come down? Or will tax cuts be paid through extending tax allowance freezes (which due to inflation constitute a tax rise)? Or will they be paid for by pencilling-in more spending cuts for after the election?
Subscribe to the Saturday Read View all newsletters Your new guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture each weekend – from the New Statesman. Sign up here Select and enter your email address The Saturday Read Your weekly guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture every Saturday - from the New Statesman. Sign up directly at saturdayread.substack.com Morning Call The New Statesman's quick and essential guide to the news and politics of the day. Sign up directly at morningcall.substack.com Events and Offers Stay up to date with NS events, subscription offers & updates. The Green Transition Weekly analysis of the shift to a new economy from the New Statesman's Spotlight on Policy team. Your email address Job title Job title
Administration / Office
Arts and Culture
Board Member
Business / Corporate Services
Client / Customer Services
Communications
Construction, Works, Engineering
Education, Curriculum and Teaching
Environment, Conservation and NRM
Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
Finance Management
Health - Medical and Nursing Management
HR, Training and Organisational Development
Information and Communications Technology
Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
Legal Officers and Practitioners
Librarians and Library Management
Management
Marketing
OH&S, Risk Management
Operations Management
Planning, Policy, Strategy
Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
Projects, Programs and Advisors
Property, Assets and Fleet Management
Public Relations and Media
Purchasing and Procurement
Quality Management
Science and Technical Research and Development
Security and Law Enforcement
Service Delivery
Sport and Recreation
Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
Wellbeing, Community / Social Services Job title Administration / Office Arts and Culture Board Member Business / Corporate Services Client / Customer Services Communications Construction, Works, Engineering Education, Curriculum and Teaching Environment, Conservation and NRM Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance Finance Management Health - Medical and Nursing Management HR, Training and Organisational Development Information and Communications Technology Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities Legal Officers and Practitioners Librarians and Library Management Management Marketing OH&S, Risk Management Operations Management Planning, Policy, Strategy Printing, Design, Publishing, Web Projects, Programs and Advisors Property, Assets and Fleet Management Public Relations and Media Purchasing and Procurement Quality Management Science and Technical Research and Development Security and Law Enforcement Service Delivery Sport and Recreation Travel, Accommodation, Tourism Wellbeing, Community / Social Services Sign up Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications. THANK YOU Close
This last point is key. The polls are so bad for the Conservatives that a penny here or a tax break there is unlikely to win over a fresh crop of voters. But they are significant for Labour. Those spending cuts will enter Rachel Reeves’s in-tray on her first day as chancellor (if Labour wins). Whether she has to implement them (or raise taxes or borrowing) will, to bang on yet again about this, depend on the nature of Labour’s fiscal rules.
Yes, governments can change their fiscal rules at will. But, as today demonstrates painfully well, once they are set in place, they dictate the amount of money a chancellor has to spend. That Hunt has “head room” to spend on tax cuts is an artificial consequence of the fiscal rules he himself chose. It does not reflect a fundamental improvement in the state of the public finances, nor does it reflect the likelihood that tax rises are probably going to be necessary to fund an ageing population.
Instead the mooted changes suggest there is an election next year the government will likely lose. In such a scenario, the most important thing could be how Labour responds.
This piece first appeared in the Morning Call newsletter; receive it every morning by subscribing on Substack here.
[See also: Keir Starmer needs a coherent plan for immigration]

This data comes from MediaIntel.Asia's Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring Platform.

Original URL: Click here to visit original article