{"id":101672,"date":"2021-05-03T23:27:50","date_gmt":"2021-05-03T15:27:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinamoneynetwork.com\/?p=124196"},"modified":"2021-05-03T23:27:50","modified_gmt":"2021-05-03T15:27:50","slug":"china-vc-tracker-april-vc-market-drops-back-with-273-deals-worth-9-26b","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2021\/05\/03\/china-vc-tracker-april-vc-market-drops-back-with-273-deals-worth-9-26b\/","title":{"rendered":"China VC Tracker: April VC Market Drops Back With 273 Deals Worth $9.26B"},"content":{"rendered":"\"\"

China\u2019s venture capital market has dropped back to a lower place of 273 venture deals worth about US$9.26 billion in April, compared to an aggregated of 336 venture capital deals worth around US$12.02 billion in March, according to China Money Network\u2019s China VC Tracker release today. China VC Tracker is produced based on proprietary data […]<\/p>\n

China VC Tracker: April VC Market Drops Back With 273 Deals Worth $9.26B<\/a> comes from China Money Network<\/a>: Primary Data for China's Primary Markets! All Rights Reserved.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

China\u2019s venture capital market has dropped back to a lower place of 273 venture deals worth about US$9.26 billion in April, compared to an aggregated of 336 venture capital deals worth around US$12.02 billion in March, according to China Money Network\u2019…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":252,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65,408,194,401,954,365],"tags":[10477,2328,10373,3836,4700,5489,10365],"class_list":["post-101672","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-beijing","category-guangzhou","category-news-chinese-law","category-shanghai","category-shenzhen","category-suzhou","tag-china-vc-tracker","tag-hangzhou","tag-hillhouse-capital-group","tag-logistics","tag-sequoia","tag-sequoia-capital-china","tag-today"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101672","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/252"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=101672"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101672\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":101673,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/101672\/revisions\/101673"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=101672"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=101672"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=101672"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}