{"id":104516,"date":"2021-05-28T17:20:52","date_gmt":"2021-05-28T09:20:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=246081"},"modified":"2021-05-28T17:20:52","modified_gmt":"2021-05-28T09:20:52","slug":"goldman-says-china-is-no-longer-center-of-commodities-pricing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2021\/05\/28\/goldman-says-china-is-no-longer-center-of-commodities-pricing\/","title":{"rendered":"Goldman says China is no longer center of commodities pricing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Goldman says China is no longer center of commodities pricing 2:57 AM<\/p>\n<p>(Reuters) \u2013 Goldman Sachs said it no longer saw China as the center of commodities pricing, reasoning the pace of demand recovery in developed markets suggested Beijing as a buyer has been crowded out by Western consumers.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>This data comes from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\" title=\"ChinaPulse.com provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring in China\" >ChinaPulse.com media intelligence and smart news insights monitoring platform<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Goldman says China is no longer center of commodities pricing 2:57 AM<br \/>\n(Reuters) \u2013 Goldman Sachs said it no longer saw China as the center of commodities pricing, reasoning the pace of demand recovery in developed markets suggested Beijing as a buyer ha&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[669,65,144,213,1607,194],"tags":[3472,10324,4441,10425,7571,10328],"class_list":["post-104516","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bank","category-beijing","category-china","category-china-news","category-manufacturing","category-news-chinese-law","tag-chinese","tag-covid-19","tag-goldman-sachs","tag-minerals","tag-oil","tag-pandemic"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104516"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=104516"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104516\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":104519,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104516\/revisions\/104519"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=104516"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=104516"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=104516"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}