{"id":105635,"date":"2021-06-06T21:38:59","date_gmt":"2021-06-06T13:38:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=250886"},"modified":"2021-06-06T21:38:59","modified_gmt":"2021-06-06T13:38:59","slug":"chinese-internet-regulators-investigate-startup-after-tiananmen-square-anniversary-post-the-wall-street-journal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2021\/06\/06\/chinese-internet-regulators-investigate-startup-after-tiananmen-square-anniversary-post-the-wall-street-journal\/","title":{"rendered":"Chinese Internet Regulators Investigate Startup After Tiananmen Square Anniversary Post \u2013 The Wall Street Journal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\/ Chinese Internet Regulators Investigate Startup After Tiananmen Square Anniversary Post \u2013 The Wall Street Journal Chinese Internet Regulators Investigate Startup After Tiananmen Square Anniversary Post \u2013 The Wall Street Journal 06\/06\/2021 by admin<\/p>\n<p>SINGAPORE\u2014A buzzy Chinese Instagram-like startup backed by the country\u2019s two biggest technology giants had its domestic social media account shut down amid an investigation by Beijing\u2019s cyber watchdog into a post it shared on the anniversary of the 1989 Tiananmen Square crackdown , according to people familiar with the situation.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>This data comes from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\" title=\"ChinaPulse.com provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring in China\" >ChinaPulse.com media intelligence and smart news insights monitoring platform<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\/ Chinese Internet Regulators Investigate Startup After Tiananmen Square Anniversary Post \u2013 The Wall Street Journal Chinese Internet Regulators Investigate Startup After Tiananmen Square Anniversary Post \u2013 The Wall Street Journal 06\/06\/2021 by admin<br \/>\nSI&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[46,144,213,49,4,194,493,401,465,1542,55,463,1242],"tags":[2263,3472,2499],"class_list":["post-105635","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-alibaba","category-china","category-china-news","category-e-commerce","category-internet","category-news-chinese-law","category-online-shopping","category-shanghai","category-social-media","category-technology","category-tencent","category-tiananmen","category-twitter","tag-amazon","tag-chinese","tag-weibo"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/105635","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=105635"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/105635\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":105636,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/105635\/revisions\/105636"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=105635"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=105635"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=105635"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}