{"id":108372,"date":"2021-06-26T19:44:00","date_gmt":"2021-06-26T11:44:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=268959"},"modified":"2021-06-26T19:44:00","modified_gmt":"2021-06-26T11:44:00","slug":"us-chinese-equipment-ban-halts-subsea-cable-bid","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2021\/06\/26\/us-chinese-equipment-ban-halts-subsea-cable-bid\/","title":{"rendered":"US Chinese equipment ban halts subsea cable bid"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>US Chinese equipment ban halts subsea cable bid 18 June 2021 &#124; Natalie Bannerman<\/p>\n<p>The East Micronesia Cable, a $72.6 million project led by the World Bank, has declined a bid by a prospective Chinese vendor due to security concerns.<\/p>\n<p>According to Reuters, the 2,000km system connecting the Pacific islands of Kiribati, Micronesia\u00c2 and Nauru, before interconnecting with the existing HANTRU1 Cable System, stalled in its negotiations to award a subsea cable supplier, after the Pacific island governments took note of the warnings from the US, that participation of a Chinese company posed a potential security threat.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>This data comes from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\" title=\"ChinaPulse.com provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring in China\" >ChinaPulse.com media intelligence and smart news insights monitoring platform<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>US Chinese equipment ban halts subsea cable bid 18 June 2021 &#124; Natalie Bannerman<br \/>\nThe East Micronesia Cable, a $72.6 million project led by the World Bank, has declined a bid by a prospective Chinese vendor due to security concerns.<br \/>\nAccording to Re&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[669,213,339,979,477,194,465,64,1542,978],"tags":[10320,3686,3472,3544,1845,2240,10327,10329,2189,10336],"class_list":["post-108372","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bank","category-china-news","category-hong-kong","category-huawei","category-investment","category-news-chinese-law","category-social-media","category-taiwan","category-technology","category-zte","tag-biden","tag-boycott","tag-chinese","tag-donald-trump","tag-facebook","tag-military","tag-pacific","tag-philippines","tag-supplier","tag-washington"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108372","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=108372"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108372\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":108373,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108372\/revisions\/108373"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=108372"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=108372"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=108372"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}