{"id":110049,"date":"2021-07-24T15:07:26","date_gmt":"2021-07-24T07:07:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.mediaintel.asia\/?p=475436"},"modified":"2021-07-24T15:07:26","modified_gmt":"2021-07-24T07:07:26","slug":"china-orders-tencent-to-give-up-exclusive-licensing-rights-as-crackdown-continues-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2021\/07\/24\/china-orders-tencent-to-give-up-exclusive-licensing-rights-as-crackdown-continues-2\/","title":{"rendered":"China Orders Tencent to Give Up Exclusive Licensing Rights as Crackdown Continues"},"content":{"rendered":"<div align=\"center\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.mediaintel.asia\/\" title=\"MediaIntel.Asia provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring in Asia\" ><img src=\"https:\/\/www.mediaintel.asia\/wp-content\/uploads\/mediaintelasia-logo-blackyellow-400x300-1.png\" border=\"0\" width=\"200\" height=\"150\" alt=\"MediaIntel.Asia\"><\/a><\/div>\n<p>Photo illustration of Tencent Music Entertainment (TME) logo, a Chinese company that develops music streaming services. Pavlo Gonchar &#124; SOPA Images &#124; LightRocket via Getty Images China's antitrust regulator ordered Tencent to give up its exclusive music licensing rights with international record labels and slapped a fine on the company, as Beijing continues to crack down on its internet giants at home.<br \/>\nThe State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) on Saturday imposed a fine of 500,000 yuan ($77,141) on the company citing violations in its acquisition of China Music in 2016.<br \/>\nThe competition watchdog ordered Tencent and its affiliates to ensure fair competition by relinquishing its exclusive music rights within 30 days, and to end requirements for copyright holders to grant the company better conditions than competitors, such as high advanced payments.<br \/>\nTencent will have to report to the SAMR on its progress every year for three years, according to the statement , and the antitrust regulator will strictly supervise its implementation according to law.<br \/>\nIn response, Tencent said it will abide by the regulator's decision and \"comply with all the regulatory requirements, fulfill our social responsibilities and contribute to healthy competition in the market.\"<br \/>\nIt comes as Beijing continues to clamp down on its domestic technology firms that have grown into some of the world's most valuable companies. The crackdown in the last few months have ranged from the suspension of Ant Group's $34.5 billion IPO last year, to Alibaba's $2.8 billion antitrust fine .<br \/>\nIn April, the SAMR summoned 34 companies including Tencent and ByteDance, and ordered them to conduct self-inspections so as to comply with anti-monopoly rules.<br \/>\nThis is breaking news. Please check back for updates.<\/p>\n<p>This data comes from <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mediaintel.asia\/\" title=\"MediaIntel.Asia provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring in Asia\" >MediaIntel.Asia's Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring Platform<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Photo illustration of Tencent Music Entertainment (TME) logo, a Chinese company that develops music streaming services. Pavlo Gonchar &#124; SOPA Images &#124; LightRocket via Getty Images China's antitrust regulator ordered Tencent to give up its exc&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":253,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[46,151,65,144,69,1527,4,194,52,493,222,472,1542,55],"tags":[2762,10406,10309,6601,3472,2274,2353,4886],"class_list":["post-110049","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-alibaba","category-antitrust","category-beijing","category-china","category-copyright","category-currency","category-internet","category-news-chinese-law","category-online-payment","category-online-shopping","category-online-video","category-renminbi","category-technology","category-tencent","tag-acquisition","tag-ant-group","tag-bytedance","tag-china-technology","tag-chinese","tag-entertainment","tag-ipo","tag-yuan"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110049","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/253"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=110049"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110049\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":110052,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/110049\/revisions\/110052"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=110049"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=110049"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=110049"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}