{"id":111085,"date":"2021-08-04T21:09:22","date_gmt":"2021-08-04T13:09:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=293135"},"modified":"2021-08-04T21:09:22","modified_gmt":"2021-08-04T13:09:22","slug":"chainalysis-removes-bitmex-from-the-high-risk-exchange-category","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2021\/08\/04\/chainalysis-removes-bitmex-from-the-high-risk-exchange-category\/","title":{"rendered":"Chainalysis Removes BitMEX From The High Risk Exchange Category"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Less than a year after Chainalysis placed BitMEX into its \u201chigh risk\u201d cryptocurrency exchanges zone, the company has reversed its decision. The analytics company has conducted an internal review of the derivatives exchanges, which has strived to improve its AML compliance lately.&#8230;<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Less than a year after Chainalysis placed BitMEX into its \u201chigh risk\u201d cryptocurrency exchanges zone, the company has reversed its decision. The analytics company has conducted an internal review of the derivatives exchanges, which has strived to improv&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[669,144,213,1527,194],"tags":[1768,5567,10390,7705,10333,6823],"class_list":["post-111085","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bank","category-china","category-china-news","category-currency","category-news-chinese-law","tag-bank-of-china","tag-bitcoin","tag-bitmex","tag-blockchain","tag-crypto","tag-fintech"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111085","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=111085"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111085\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":111088,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111085\/revisions\/111088"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=111085"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=111085"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=111085"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}