{"id":111347,"date":"2021-08-06T21:04:00","date_gmt":"2021-08-06T13:04:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=294885"},"modified":"2021-08-06T21:04:00","modified_gmt":"2021-08-06T13:04:00","slug":"biden-administration-doesnt-favour-granting-veto-power-to-india-in-expanded-un-security-council","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2021\/08\/06\/biden-administration-doesnt-favour-granting-veto-power-to-india-in-expanded-un-security-council\/","title":{"rendered":"Biden Administration Doesn't Favour Granting Veto Power to India in Expanded UN Security Council"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>While backing the inclusion of India in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) as a permanent member, the United States on Thursday expressed reservations about granting the veto power to any other nation except the existing five permanent members. &#8220;We support building a consensus for modest enlargement of the Security Council for both permanent and non-permanent members, provided it does not diminish its effectiveness or its efficacy and does not alter or expand the veto&#8221;, US State Department spokesperson Ned Price said at a briefing on Thursday.&#8230;<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>While backing the inclusion of India in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) as a permanent member, the United States on Thursday expressed reservations about granting the veto power to any other nation except the existing five permanent members&#8230;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65,144,213,931,194,1234,249,484],"tags":[10320,3472,3544,7654,3450,10325,10349,3402,3549],"class_list":["post-111347","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-beijing","category-china","category-china-news","category-india","category-news-chinese-law","category-obama","category-russia","category-united-states","tag-biden","tag-chinese","tag-donald-trump","tag-france","tag-indian","tag-new-delhi","tag-peace","tag-united-kingdom","tag-united-nations"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111347"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=111347"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111347\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":111348,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111347\/revisions\/111348"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=111347"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=111347"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=111347"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}