{"id":113334,"date":"2021-08-14T21:09:05","date_gmt":"2021-08-14T13:09:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=302131"},"modified":"2021-08-14T21:09:05","modified_gmt":"2021-08-14T13:09:05","slug":"bitcoin-firm-reveals-its-total-btc-reserves-urges-other-crypto-exchanges-to-disclose-holdings","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2021\/08\/14\/bitcoin-firm-reveals-its-total-btc-reserves-urges-other-crypto-exchanges-to-disclose-holdings\/","title":{"rendered":"Bitcoin Firm Reveals Its Total BTC Reserves, Urges Other Crypto Exchanges To Disclose Holdings"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Crypto derivatives platform BitMEX is revealing its total Bitcoin (BTC) reserve balance and is suggesting that other exchanges go public with their reserves as well. In a new blog post, BitMEX says that it holds 110,090 Bitcoin, worth $5.23 billion at time of writing.&#8230;<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Crypto derivatives platform BitMEX is revealing its total Bitcoin (BTC) reserve balance and is suggesting that other exchanges go public with their reserves as well. In a new blog post, BitMEX says that it holds 110,090 Bitcoin, worth $5.23 billion at &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[213,671,137,194],"tags":[5567,10390,7705,10333,6823],"class_list":["post-113334","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-china-news","category-finance","category-fraud","category-news-chinese-law","tag-bitcoin","tag-bitmex","tag-blockchain","tag-crypto","tag-fintech"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/113334"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=113334"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/113334\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":113335,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/113334\/revisions\/113335"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=113334"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=113334"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=113334"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}