{"id":114028,"date":"2021-08-16T20:44:00","date_gmt":"2021-08-16T12:44:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=303634"},"modified":"2021-08-16T20:44:00","modified_gmt":"2021-08-16T12:44:00","slug":"ipo-price-setting-scrutiny-leads-to-chinese-regulators-punishing-19-institutions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2021\/08\/16\/ipo-price-setting-scrutiny-leads-to-chinese-regulators-punishing-19-institutions\/","title":{"rendered":"IPO price-setting scrutiny leads to Chinese regulators punishing 19 institutions"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>China\u2019s securities regulators punished 19 institutional investors as authorities tighten scrutiny over price-setting behaviors under a more liberalized listing system, reported Reuters . China launched the tech-focused STAR Market in Shanghai in mid-2019, along with the introduction of a US-style, registration-based initial public offering (IPO) system in that market.&#8230;<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>China\u2019s securities regulators punished 19 institutional investors as authorities tighten scrutiny over price-setting behaviors under a more liberalized listing system, reported Reuters . China launched the tech-focused STAR Market in Shanghai in mid-20&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[144,213,194,401,1542],"tags":[3472,2353,10312],"class_list":["post-114028","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-china","category-china-news","category-news-chinese-law","category-shanghai","category-technology","tag-chinese","tag-ipo","tag-stock-exchange"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114028","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=114028"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114028\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":114029,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114028\/revisions\/114029"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=114028"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=114028"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=114028"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}