{"id":118744,"date":"2021-09-09T18:10:00","date_gmt":"2021-09-09T10:10:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=324918"},"modified":"2021-09-09T18:10:00","modified_gmt":"2021-09-09T10:10:00","slug":"court-dismisses-market-manipulation-claims-against-bitmex","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2021\/09\/09\/court-dismisses-market-manipulation-claims-against-bitmex\/","title":{"rendered":"Court Dismisses Market Manipulation Claims Against BitMEX"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A US court has dismissed claims against crypto derivatives exchange BitMEX arguing that a significant portion of the charges have been copied from other claims against the company, Law360 has reported . This is a lawsuit in which BitMEX was accused of manipulating the crypto market, as well as violating racketeering laws.&#8230;<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A US court has dismissed claims against crypto derivatives exchange BitMEX arguing that a significant portion of the charges have been copied from other claims against the company, Law360 has reported . This is a lawsuit in which BitMEX was accused of &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[213,785,194],"tags":[5567,10390,7705,10333,6823],"class_list":["post-118744","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-china-news","category-new-york","category-news-chinese-law","tag-bitcoin","tag-bitmex","tag-blockchain","tag-crypto","tag-fintech"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118744","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=118744"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118744\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":118745,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118744\/revisions\/118745"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=118744"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=118744"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=118744"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}