{"id":122615,"date":"2021-09-21T19:25:00","date_gmt":"2021-09-21T11:25:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=335051"},"modified":"2021-09-21T19:25:00","modified_gmt":"2021-09-21T11:25:00","slug":"former-huawei-smartphone-unit-faces-a-blacklist","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2021\/09\/21\/former-huawei-smartphone-unit-faces-a-blacklist\/","title":{"rendered":"Former Huawei smartphone unit faces a blacklist"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Key security agencies are divided over whether to place Huawei&#8217;s former smartphone company on an export blacklist, showing that the Trump-era debates about the trade-offs of doing business with Chinese technology companies continues during the Biden administration.<\/p>\n<p>Last week, career personnel at four agencies responsible for making such decisions split on whether to put the smartphone-maker, Honor, on the Commerce Department&#8217;s entity list, which bars exports of US technology to the sanctioned firm without a department license.&#8230;<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Key security agencies are divided over whether to place Huawei's former smartphone company on an export blacklist, showing that the Trump-era debates about the trade-offs of doing business with Chinese technology companies continues during the Bi&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[669,639,692,144,213,586,137,113,138,979,873,1607,194],"tags":[7662,10320,3686,3472,10321,1696,3544,2274,3929,3556,2724,10460,2172,7382],"class_list":["post-122615","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bank","category-california","category-canada","category-china","category-china-news","category-economy","category-fraud","category-google","category-guangdong","category-huawei","category-iran","category-manufacturing","category-news-chinese-law","tag-5g","tag-biden","tag-boycott","tag-chinese","tag-communist","tag-congress","tag-donald-trump","tag-entertainment","tag-espionage","tag-export","tag-exports","tag-extradition","tag-national-security","tag-qualcomm"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122615","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=122615"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122615\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":122616,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/122615\/revisions\/122616"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=122615"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=122615"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=122615"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}