{"id":132293,"date":"2021-11-30T01:24:00","date_gmt":"2021-11-29T17:24:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=394148"},"modified":"2021-11-30T01:24:00","modified_gmt":"2021-11-29T17:24:00","slug":"disney-pulls-the-simpsons-tiananmen-square-episode-in-hong-kong","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2021\/11\/30\/disney-pulls-the-simpsons-tiananmen-square-episode-in-hong-kong\/","title":{"rendered":"Disney+ Pulls The Simpsons Tiananmen Square Episode in Hong Kong"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Disney has censored The Simpsons on its streaming service in Hong Kong , omitting an episode that mentions the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre.<\/p>\n<p>Episodes 11 and 13 of season 16 are available to view in Hong Kong, but not episode 12, \u201cGoo Goo Gai Pain.\u201d&#8230;<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Disney has censored The Simpsons on its streaming service in Hong Kong , omitting an episode that mentions the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre.<br \/>\nEpisodes 11 and 13 of season 16 are available to view in Hong Kong, but not episode 12, \u201cGoo Goo Gai Pain.\u201d&amp;#&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[928,144,213,393,325,671,339,194,463,334],"tags":[3472,2375,10338,2274,10460,2172,1816,10385],"class_list":["post-132293","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-censorship","category-china","category-china-news","category-disney","category-education","category-finance","category-hong-kong","category-news-chinese-law","category-tiananmen","category-university","tag-chinese","tag-christianity","tag-democracy","tag-entertainment","tag-extradition","tag-national-security","tag-prison","tag-security-law"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132293","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=132293"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132293\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":132294,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132293\/revisions\/132294"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=132293"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=132293"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=132293"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}