{"id":132403,"date":"2021-12-05T15:29:00","date_gmt":"2021-12-05T07:29:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=397010"},"modified":"2021-12-05T15:29:00","modified_gmt":"2021-12-05T07:29:00","slug":"why-didnt-china-adopt-a-multi-party-system-cgtn","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2021\/12\/05\/why-didnt-china-adopt-a-multi-party-system-cgtn\/","title":{"rendered":"Why didn't China adopt a multi-party system? \u2013 CGTN"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>For more:<\/p>\n<p>cgtn.com\/video<\/p>\n<p>Facing the question of why #China does not adopt a multi-party system or a two-party system, Chairman of the China Institute of Innovation and Development Strategy Zheng Bijian points out that reformists in China were very keen to take the best knowledge and practices from the West &#8211; including multi-party competition in early times &#8211; but China&#8217;s multi-party system went completely bankrupt.&#8230;<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>For more:<br \/>\ncgtn.com\/video<br \/>\nFacing the question of why #China does not adopt a multi-party system or a two-party system, Chairman of the China Institute of Innovation and Development Strategy Zheng Bijian points out that reformists in China were very keen&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[126,144,213,113,194,222,106,1340],"tags":[2005,10656,10321,10338],"class_list":["post-132403","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-apple","category-china","category-china-news","category-google","category-news-chinese-law","category-online-video","category-search-engine","category-youtube","tag-android","tag-cgtn","tag-communist","tag-democracy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132403","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=132403"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132403\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":132407,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132403\/revisions\/132407"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=132403"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=132403"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=132403"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}