{"id":132520,"date":"2021-12-07T19:50:13","date_gmt":"2021-12-07T11:50:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=397777"},"modified":"2021-12-07T19:50:13","modified_gmt":"2021-12-07T11:50:13","slug":"kremlin-us-decision-on-beijing-olympics-can-hardly-be-called-boycott-07-12-2021-sputnik-international","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2021\/12\/07\/kremlin-us-decision-on-beijing-olympics-can-hardly-be-called-boycott-07-12-2021-sputnik-international\/","title":{"rendered":"Kremlin: US Decision on Beijing Olympics Can Hardly Be Called Boycott  07.12.2021, Sputnik International"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On Monday, the White House announced a &#8220;diplomatic boycott&#8221; of the Beijing Olympics. In response, Beijing made a representation to Washington.&#8221;It&#8217;s hard to say how much of a boycott this is, because after all, the Olympics are being held in rather tough conditions associated with pandemic restrictions.&#8230;<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On Monday, the White House announced a \"diplomatic boycott\" of the Beijing Olympics. In response, Beijing made a representation to Washington.\"It's hard to say how much of a boycott this is, because after all, the Olympics are b&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65,144,213,194,1332],"tags":[3686,3472,3610,3796,10328,10332,7596,10336],"class_list":["post-132520","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-beijing","category-china","category-china-news","category-news-chinese-law","category-white-house","tag-boycott","tag-chinese","tag-diplomacy","tag-olympics","tag-pandemic","tag-sanctions","tag-sports","tag-washington"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132520","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=132520"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132520\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":132521,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/132520\/revisions\/132521"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=132520"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=132520"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=132520"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}