{"id":135343,"date":"2022-01-26T19:59:44","date_gmt":"2022-01-26T11:59:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=417086"},"modified":"2022-01-26T19:59:44","modified_gmt":"2022-01-26T11:59:44","slug":"vietnamese-firm-found-inflating-chinese-covid-19-test-kit-prices-by-21-times-dispatchist-com","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2022\/01\/26\/vietnamese-firm-found-inflating-chinese-covid-19-test-kit-prices-by-21-times-dispatchist-com\/","title":{"rendered":"Vietnamese firm found inflating Chinese COVID-19 test kit prices by 21 times  dispatchist.com"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The import price was US$0.955 per unit compared with the selling price of $20.75 The unit price for the rapid coronavirus test kits imported by Ho Chi Minh City-based Viet A Technology Corporation (Viet A Corp) from China was US$0.This&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>This data comes from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\" title=\"ChinaPulse.com provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring in China\" >ChinaPulse.com media intelligence and smart news insights monitoring platform<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The import price was US$0.955 per unit compared with the selling price of $20.75 The unit price for the rapid coronavirus test kits imported by Ho Chi Minh City-based Viet A Technology Corporation (Viet A Corp) from China was US$0.This&#8230;<br \/>\nThis data&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[144,213,194,1108,1542],"tags":[3472,10323,10324,10513,2127,3904],"class_list":["post-135343","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-china","category-china-news","category-news-chinese-law","category-police","category-technology","tag-chinese","tag-coronavirus","tag-covid-19","tag-ho-chi-minh-city","tag-import","tag-vietnam"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/135343"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=135343"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/135343\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":135344,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/135343\/revisions\/135344"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=135343"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=135343"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=135343"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}