{"id":135923,"date":"2022-01-29T23:45:39","date_gmt":"2022-01-29T15:45:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=418321"},"modified":"2022-01-29T23:45:39","modified_gmt":"2022-01-29T15:45:39","slug":"wto-backs-china-in-trade-dispute-with-us","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2022\/01\/29\/wto-backs-china-in-trade-dispute-with-us\/","title":{"rendered":"WTO backs China in trade dispute with US"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The global trade regulator has issued a decision on China&#8217;s tariff countermeasures against the United States<\/p>\n<p>The World Trade Organization (WTO) allowed China this week to retaliate with duties on $645 million worth of US imports per year over Washington&#8217;s failure to comply with international trade rules.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>This data comes from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\" title=\"ChinaPulse.com provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring in China\" >ChinaPulse.com media intelligence and smart news insights monitoring platform<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The global trade regulator has issued a decision on China's tariff countermeasures against the United States<br \/>\nThe World Trade Organization (WTO) allowed China this week to retaliate with duties on $645 million worth of US imports per year over Was&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65,144,213,586,671,89,194,484,552],"tags":[3472,3544,2127,10336],"class_list":["post-135923","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-beijing","category-china","category-china-news","category-economy","category-finance","category-ministry-of-commerce","category-news-chinese-law","category-united-states","category-wto","tag-chinese","tag-donald-trump","tag-import","tag-washington"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/135923","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=135923"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/135923\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":135924,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/135923\/revisions\/135924"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=135923"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=135923"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=135923"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}