{"id":136664,"date":"2022-02-11T08:00:26","date_gmt":"2022-02-11T00:00:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=423098"},"modified":"2022-02-11T08:00:26","modified_gmt":"2022-02-11T00:00:26","slug":"chinese-exile-guo-wengui-held-in-contempt-must-pay-134-million","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2022\/02\/11\/chinese-exile-guo-wengui-held-in-contempt-must-pay-134-million\/","title":{"rendered":"Chinese Exile Guo Wengui Held in Contempt, Must Pay $134 Million"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>(Bloomberg) &#8212; A judge found Guo Wengui in contempt and ordered him to pay $134 million to a creditor, ruling the exiled Chinese businessman moved a yacht out of U.S. waters to shield it from debt collection.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>This data comes from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\" title=\"ChinaPulse.com provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring in China\" >ChinaPulse.com media intelligence and smart news insights monitoring platform<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(Bloomberg) &#8212; A judge found Guo Wengui in contempt and ordered him to pay $134 million to a creditor, ruling the exiled Chinese businessman moved a yacht out of U.S. waters to shield it from debt collection.&#8230;<br \/>\nThis data comes from the ChinaP&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[213,785,194],"tags":[8493,3472,3544,10510,3574,10327,10509,3402],"class_list":["post-136664","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-china-news","category-new-york","category-news-chinese-law","tag-britain","tag-chinese","tag-donald-trump","tag-guo-wengui","tag-italy","tag-pacific","tag-steve-bannon","tag-united-kingdom"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136664","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=136664"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136664\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":136665,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/136664\/revisions\/136665"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=136664"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=136664"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=136664"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}