{"id":138768,"date":"2022-05-11T20:14:38","date_gmt":"2022-05-11T12:14:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=458610"},"modified":"2022-05-11T20:14:38","modified_gmt":"2022-05-11T12:14:38","slug":"thai-army-boycott-of-online-retailer-lazada-shows-ignorance-of-e-commerce-say-critics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2022\/05\/11\/thai-army-boycott-of-online-retailer-lazada-shows-ignorance-of-e-commerce-say-critics\/","title":{"rendered":"Thai army boycott of online retailer Lazada shows ignorance of e-commerce, say critics"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Thai military\u2019s boycott of e-commerce platform Lazada is being criticised as a sign of regulatory overreach and for their ignorance of how e-commerce functions. That reaction followed an order issued on Monday by the army barring the delivery of goods from Lazada, and its personnel from shopping on the website, following the release of a promotional video seen as mocking the royals last week.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>This data comes from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\" title=\"ChinaPulse.com provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring in China\" >ChinaPulse.com media intelligence and smart news insights monitoring platform<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Thai military\u2019s boycott of e-commerce platform Lazada is being criticised as a sign of regulatory overreach and for their ignorance of how e-commerce functions. That reaction followed an order issued on Monday by the army barring the delivery of go&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[46,144,213,49,586,325,755,1607,194,493,222,1002,465,1542],"tags":[10382,10416,10355,3686,10309,3472,1804,2274,1845,2240,10322,1816,10332],"class_list":["post-138768","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-alibaba","category-china","category-china-news","category-e-commerce","category-economy","category-education","category-factory","category-manufacturing","category-news-chinese-law","category-online-shopping","category-online-video","category-retail","category-social-media","category-technology","tag-activist","tag-air-force","tag-army","tag-boycott","tag-bytedance","tag-chinese","tag-computer","tag-entertainment","tag-facebook","tag-military","tag-navy","tag-prison","tag-sanctions"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138768"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=138768"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138768\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":138769,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138768\/revisions\/138769"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=138768"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=138768"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=138768"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}