{"id":138941,"date":"2022-05-14T13:19:41","date_gmt":"2022-05-14T05:19:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=459506"},"modified":"2022-05-14T13:19:41","modified_gmt":"2022-05-14T05:19:41","slug":"australia-says-chinese-spy-ship-did-not-breach-law-of-the-sea-breaking","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2022\/05\/14\/australia-says-chinese-spy-ship-did-not-breach-law-of-the-sea-breaking\/","title":{"rendered":"Australia says Chinese spy ship did not breach law of the sea -Breaking"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>SYDNEY (Reuters).-A Chinese intelligence ship was found off Australia\u2019s West Coast, within 50 miles of a critical defence facility. This did not constitute a violation of international maritime laws. Australia stated on Saturday.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>This data comes from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\" title=\"ChinaPulse.com provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring in China\" >ChinaPulse.com media intelligence and smart news insights monitoring platform<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>SYDNEY (Reuters).-A Chinese intelligence ship was found off Australia\u2019s West Coast, within 50 miles of a critical defence facility. This did not constitute a violation of international maritime laws. Australia stated on Saturday.&#8230;<br \/>\nThis data comes&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[144,213,194],"tags":[10355,2086,3472,10331,10342,3929,7003,10428,2240,2172,10322,10327,10505,8399],"class_list":["post-138941","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-china","category-china-news","category-news-chinese-law","tag-army","tag-australia","tag-chinese","tag-elections","tag-embassy","tag-espionage","tag-maritime","tag-melbourne","tag-military","tag-national-security","tag-navy","tag-pacific","tag-scott-morrison","tag-spy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138941","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=138941"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138941\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":138942,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/138941\/revisions\/138942"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=138941"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=138941"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=138941"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}