{"id":139337,"date":"2022-05-28T08:59:08","date_gmt":"2022-05-28T00:59:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=464601"},"modified":"2022-05-28T08:59:08","modified_gmt":"2022-05-28T00:59:08","slug":"top-gun-loses-chinese-investor-due-to-pro-u-s-messaging","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2022\/05\/28\/top-gun-loses-chinese-investor-due-to-pro-u-s-messaging\/","title":{"rendered":"'TOP GUN' Loses Chinese Investor Due to Pro-U.S. Messaging\u2026"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/p>\n

https:\/\/www.wsj.com\/articles\/top-gun-maverick-loses-chinese-investor-due-to-pro-u-s-messaging-11653643803<\/p>\n

In an entertainment industry full of uncertainty, few movies seemed as sure a bet as a sequel to the 1986 classic \u201cTop Gun.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Chinese tech firm Tencent Holdings in 2019 signed on to co-finance the film, which the Shenzhen-based conglomerate hoped would yield a windfall at the box office.…<\/p>\n

This data comes from the ChinaPulse.com media intelligence and smart news insights monitoring platform<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

https:\/\/www.wsj.com\/articles\/top-gun-maverick-loses-chinese-investor-due-to-pro-u-s-messaging-11653643803
\nIn an entertainment industry full of uncertainty, few movies seemed as sure a bet as a sequel to the 1986 classic \u201cTop Gun.\u201d
\nThe Chinese tech fir…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[213,671,138,477,194,954,1542,55],"tags":[7487,3472,2274],"class_list":["post-139337","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-china-news","category-finance","category-guangdong","category-investment","category-news-chinese-law","category-shenzhen","category-technology","category-tencent","tag-box-office","tag-chinese","tag-entertainment"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/139337"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=139337"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/139337\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":139338,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/139337\/revisions\/139338"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=139337"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=139337"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=139337"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}