{"id":139460,"date":"2022-05-30T13:16:40","date_gmt":"2022-05-30T05:16:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=465143"},"modified":"2022-05-30T13:16:40","modified_gmt":"2022-05-30T05:16:40","slug":"pawan-khera-tweets-kami-reh-gayi-after-cong-denies-rs-ticket-nagma-says-my-asian-marketplace","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2022\/05\/30\/pawan-khera-tweets-kami-reh-gayi-after-cong-denies-rs-ticket-nagma-says-my-asian-marketplace\/","title":{"rendered":"Pawan Khera tweets 'kami reh gayi' after Cong denies RS ticket, Nagma says\u2026  My Asian Marketplace"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>#MyAsianMarketplace #News #Update Congress national spokesperson Pawan Khera who is from Rajasthan has been ditched but Randeep Singh Surjewala, Mukul Wasnik and Pramod Tiwari, who are not from Rajasthan, have been selected to represent the state in the Rajya Sabha election.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>This data comes from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\" title=\"ChinaPulse.com provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring in China\" >ChinaPulse.com media intelligence and smart news insights monitoring platform<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>#MyAsianMarketplace #News #Update Congress national spokesperson Pawan Khera who is from Rajasthan has been ditched but Randeep Singh Surjewala, Mukul Wasnik and Pramod Tiwari, who are not from Rajasthan, have been selected to represent the state in th&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[213,194],"tags":[1696,10331,2274],"class_list":["post-139460","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-china-news","category-news-chinese-law","tag-congress","tag-elections","tag-entertainment"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/139460"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=139460"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/139460\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":139461,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/139460\/revisions\/139461"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=139460"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=139460"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=139460"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}