{"id":140242,"date":"2022-06-20T20:09:08","date_gmt":"2022-06-20T12:09:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=472378"},"modified":"2022-06-20T20:09:08","modified_gmt":"2022-06-20T12:09:08","slug":"377-covid-cases-in-beijing-since-june-9","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2022\/06\/20\/377-covid-cases-in-beijing-since-june-9\/","title":{"rendered":"377 COVID Cases in Beijing Since June 9"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Beijing has recorded a total of 377 locally transmitted cases of COVID-19 between June 9 and 3pm today (June 20) in the city&#8217;s latest outbreak.<\/p>\n<p>Of the total number of cases, Chaoyang district has seen 201, Xicheng 27, Fengtai 27, Dongcheng 25, Tongzhou 20, Changping 20, Haidian 18, Daxing 12, Mentougou seven, Fangshan six, Beijing Economic and Technological Development Area six, Shijingshan three, Shunyi two, Huairou two and Miyun one.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>This data comes from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\" title=\"ChinaPulse.com provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring in China\" >ChinaPulse.com media intelligence and smart news insights monitoring platform<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Beijing has recorded a total of 377 locally transmitted cases of COVID-19 between June 9 and 3pm today (June 20) in the city's latest outbreak.<br \/>\nOf the total number of cases, Chaoyang district has seen 201, Xicheng 27, Fengtai 27, Dongcheng 25, To&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65,213,586,883,194,465],"tags":[10324,2274,10659,10343,2499],"class_list":["post-140242","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-beijing","category-china-news","category-economy","category-haidian","category-news-chinese-law","category-social-media","tag-covid-19","tag-entertainment","tag-quarantine","tag-supermarket","tag-weibo"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140242","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=140242"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140242\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":140243,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140242\/revisions\/140243"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=140242"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=140242"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=140242"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}