{"id":140323,"date":"2022-06-21T20:13:09","date_gmt":"2022-06-21T12:13:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=472713"},"modified":"2022-06-21T20:13:09","modified_gmt":"2022-06-21T12:13:09","slug":"the-chinese-court-canceled-the-transaction-for-the-sale-of-cars-for-cryptocurrency-crypto-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2022\/06\/21\/the-chinese-court-canceled-the-transaction-for-the-sale-of-cars-for-cryptocurrency-crypto-news\/","title":{"rendered":"The Chinese court canceled the transaction for the sale of cars for cryptocurrency  Crypto News"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Reading time: ~2 m<\/p>\n<p>What happened? A Shanghai court in China invalidated a deal to buy a car for cryptocurrency, which occurred in 2019. Mr. Huang signed a purchase and sale agreement with an unnamed car dealership for an Audi AL6 for 409,800 yuan ($ 59,477) in exchange for 1281 Unilash tokens (UNIH), but did not receive the car within the period specified in the contract.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>This data comes from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\" title=\"ChinaPulse.com provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring in China\" >ChinaPulse.com media intelligence and smart news insights monitoring platform<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Reading time: ~2 m<br \/>\nWhat happened? A Shanghai court in China invalidated a deal to buy a car for cryptocurrency, which occurred in 2019. Mr. Huang signed a purchase and sale agreement with an unnamed car dealership for an Audi AL6 for 409,800 yuan ($ 59&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[144,213,1527,49,194,472,401,465,55],"tags":[5567,7705,3686,7007,3472,10333,6823,8064,4886],"class_list":["post-140323","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-china","category-china-news","category-currency","category-e-commerce","category-news-chinese-law","category-renminbi","category-shanghai","category-social-media","category-tencent","tag-bitcoin","tag-blockchain","tag-boycott","tag-car","tag-chinese","tag-crypto","tag-fintech","tag-wechat","tag-yuan"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140323","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=140323"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140323\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":140324,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/140323\/revisions\/140324"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=140323"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=140323"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=140323"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}