{"id":146007,"date":"2023-02-08T08:00:00","date_gmt":"2023-02-08T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.mediaintel.asia\/?p=913419"},"modified":"2023-02-08T08:00:00","modified_gmt":"2023-02-08T00:00:00","slug":"explainer-what-we-know-and-dont-know-about-the-chinese-balloon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2023\/02\/08\/explainer-what-we-know-and-dont-know-about-the-chinese-balloon\/","title":{"rendered":"EXPLAINER: What we know and don\u2019t know about the Chinese balloon"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"MediaIntel.Asia\"<\/a><\/div>\n

FILE PHOTO: The suspected Chinese spy balloon drifts to the ocean after being shot down off the coast in Surfside Beach, South Carolina, U.S. February 4, 2023.
\nHere are details about the balloon that has triggered a dramatic diplomatic dispute between the US and China
\nSHANGHAI, China \u2013 The US shooting down of what Washington says was a Chinese spy balloon and Beijing says was a civilian scientific vessel accidentally blown off course has fueled widespread questions, including about the balloon itself.
\nMore is likely to be learned about the balloon after the US military recovers its remnants from the ocean off the coast of South Carolina.
\nHere\u2019s what we know, and don\u2019t know, about the balloon that has triggered a dramatic diplomatic dispute between the two powers:
\nHow big is it?
\nThe head of North American Aerospace Defence Command, General Glen VanHerck, described the balloon as being 200 feet (61 metres) high, with a surveillance payload the size of a regional passenger jet that likely weighed in excess of a couple thousand pounds.
\nCivilians viewing the balloon from the ground described it as a giant white orb as it floated about 60,000 feet (18,300 meters) above the central United States, an altitude roughly twice that of civilian air traffic.
\nUS officials said they had been tracking the high-altitude for some time and that it drifted over the United States for at least seven days.
\nWhat has China said?
\nChina\u2019s foreign ministry said the balloon was mainly used for meteorological purposes and had limited self-steering ability. It said it was affected by the weather and unexpectedly drifted into US airspace.
\nThe ministry has also said it has no information to share about what company or entity owns the balloon.
\nWas it a weather balloon?
\nKaymont, a US firm that makes and distributes weather balloons globally, said the size, payload and flight time exceeded the capabilities of typical weather balloons that are made of latex.
\n\u201cA typical weather forecasting balloon will have a lightweight radiosonde payload that is about 200 grams in weight. The balloon at release will be about 1.4 meters and will burst around 6 meters in diameter, and the flight time will be between 90-120 minutes,\u201d Jesse Geffen, a Kaymont account manager, told Reuters.
\n\u201cPhotographic payloads (high altitude photography and videography) may be carried by larger balloons, but wouldn\u2019t even be a third of the size of the balloon that flew over the country.\u201d
\nIn China, the manufacture of weather balloons is dominated by a subsidiary of state chemical giant ChemChina, Zhuzhou R&D Institute for Rubber & Plastics (Zhuzhou Rubber), which makes 75% of high-altitude balloons used by the China Meteorological Administration, the country\u2019s regulator of state-owned firms said in a statement last year.
\nSmaller players include Guangzhou Double-One Weather Equipment Company, whose company\u2019s chairman Lin Xiuping told Reuters that her firm and Zhuzhou Rubber were capable of making balloons that could fly at the height the Chinese balloon was flying at over the United States.
\nShe said, however, that Guangzhou Double-One was not the manufacturer of that balloon.
\nAn employee that answered the phone at Zhuzhou Rubber\u2019s headquarters said the US balloon had nothing to do with the company and declined to accept further questions.
\nSo what kind of balloon is it?
\nKaymont said the balloon was likely made of plastic film, not latex. Some descriptions thus far of the balloon debris being retrieved from the Atlantic Ocean say that there has been plastic.
\nBy looks and by size, it resembles balloons made by US firm Aerostar, whose own balloon was mistaken for the Chinese one while flying over Memphis.
\nAerostar is an aerospace and defense contractor that supplies stratospheric balloons to the likes of National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) made out of polyethylene film that can fly for over 200 days and carry hundreds of pounds.
\nIt also previously had a deal with Google to use such balloons to provide internet to rural areas.
\nOther companies that develop stratospheric balloon systems include US space tourism firm World View and French firm CNIM Air Space.
\nChina does not appear to have a private company equivalent, but the official Chinese Academy of Sciences\u2019 Aerospace Information Research Institute (AIR) and Institute of Optoelectronics have both conducted significant research on stratospheric balloons and published accounts of launches.
\nIn 2017, for example, the Institute of Optoelectronics announced it had successfully flown a \u201csuper pressure\u201d balloon it had developed in Inner Mongolia, describing it as having a volume of 7,000 cubic meters and able to carry 150 kilograms.
\nLast September, China\u2019s AIR announced the successful trial of a balloon that can reach heights of 30 km and carry up to 1.2 tons as part of a project for developing near-space technologies.
\nAIR is particularly keen on stratospheric balloon technology and has posted several articles on its WeChat account about Aerostar.
\nReuters was not able to immediately establish what firms supply AIR or the Institute of Optoelectronics with their balloons.
\nBoth institutes did not respond to requests for comment.
\nChinese military researchers have recently argued in publicly-available papers that balloons and airships should be further developed and deployed across a range of missions, Reuters reported on Monday.
\nWhile analysts did not yet know the size of the Chinese balloon fleet, US officials have spoken of dozens of missions since 2018 across five continents, with some targeting Japan, India, Vietnam, Taiwan and the Philippines. \u2013 Rappler.com<\/p>\n

This data comes from MediaIntel.Asia's Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring Platform<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

FILE PHOTO: The suspected Chinese spy balloon drifts to the ocean after being shot down off the coast in Surfside Beach, South Carolina, U.S. February 4, 2023.
\nHere are details about the balloon that has triggered a dramatic diplomatic dispute between…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":253,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65,144,1304,113,138,408,931,4,693,1607,194,106,401,465],"tags":[10640,3472,3610,2274,3929,7654,10437,8809,10315,2240,10438,1896,10329],"class_list":["post-146007","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-beijing","category-china","category-employee","category-google","category-guangdong","category-guangzhou","category-india","category-internet","category-japan","category-manufacturing","category-news-chinese-law","category-search-engine","category-shanghai","category-social-media","tag-atlantic-ocean","tag-chinese","tag-diplomacy","tag-entertainment","tag-espionage","tag-france","tag-inner-mongolia","tag-manufacturer","tag-media-intelligence","tag-military","tag-mongolia","tag-nasa","tag-philippines"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/146007","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/253"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=146007"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/146007\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":146008,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/146007\/revisions\/146008"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=146007"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=146007"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=146007"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}