{"id":150739,"date":"2023-03-28T17:27:15","date_gmt":"2023-03-28T09:27:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=513969"},"modified":"2023-03-28T17:27:15","modified_gmt":"2023-03-28T09:27:15","slug":"yet-another-major-regulator-has-ruled-in-favor-of-the-xbox-activision-blizzard-merger","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2023\/03\/28\/yet-another-major-regulator-has-ruled-in-favor-of-the-xbox-activision-blizzard-merger\/","title":{"rendered":"Yet another major regulator has ruled in favor of the Xbox, Activision-Blizzard merger"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>What you need to know<\/p>\n<p>Microsoft is attempting to purchase Activision-Blizzard for a massive $69 billion dollars.<\/p>\n<p>The transaction for the Call of Duty maker has been under heavy scrutiny with regulators across the globe.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>This data comes from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\" title=\"ChinaPulse.com provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring in China\" >ChinaPulse.com media intelligence and smart news insights monitoring platform<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What you need to know<br \/>\nMicrosoft is attempting to purchase Activision-Blizzard for a massive $69 billion dollars.<br \/>\nThe transaction for the Call of Duty maker has been under heavy scrutiny with regulators across the globe.&#8230;<br \/>\nThis data comes from the &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[151,144,213,477,693,360,194,41,78,484],"tags":[1696,10352,3402],"class_list":["post-150739","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-antitrust","category-china","category-china-news","category-investment","category-japan","category-microsoft","category-news-chinese-law","category-online-game","category-software","category-united-states","tag-congress","tag-european","tag-united-kingdom"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/150739","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=150739"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/150739\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":150740,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/150739\/revisions\/150740"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=150739"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=150739"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=150739"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}