{"id":153780,"date":"2023-04-16T19:21:00","date_gmt":"2023-04-16T11:21:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=515279"},"modified":"2023-04-16T19:21:00","modified_gmt":"2023-04-16T11:21:00","slug":"chinese-diplomat-blasts-australian-government-ban-on-tiktok-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2023\/04\/16\/chinese-diplomat-blasts-australian-government-ban-on-tiktok-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Chinese diplomat blasts Australian Government ban on TikTok"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A former Chinese diplomat has labelled Australia\u2019s TikTok ban on government devices \u201cracism\u201d, telling the Government: \u201cYou do not want to have an enemy with 1.4 billion people.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In an interview with 60 Minutes, former diplomat and CCP mouthpiece Victor Gao said of the ban: \u201cProbably it\u2019s racism, probably it\u2019s racial discrimination, probably it\u2019s banning Chinese again, which was a disaster many years ago.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>This data comes from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\" title=\"ChinaPulse.com provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring in China\" >ChinaPulse.com media intelligence and smart news insights monitoring platform<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A former Chinese diplomat has labelled Australia\u2019s TikTok ban on government devices \u201cracism\u201d, telling the Government: \u201cYou do not want to have an enemy with 1.4 billion people.\u201d<br \/>\nIn an interview with 60 Minutes, former diplomat and CCP mouthpiece Victor&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[692,144,213,1012,671,931,194,222],"tags":[10401,2210,2086,3686,10309,3472,10321,3868,9494,3610,2274,3929,10352,7654,3450,10339,3563,10340,2961],"class_list":["post-153780","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-canada","category-china","category-china-news","category-communism","category-finance","category-india","category-news-chinese-law","category-online-video","tag-afghanistan","tag-america","tag-australia","tag-boycott","tag-bytedance","tag-chinese","tag-communist","tag-cybersecurity","tag-denmark","tag-diplomacy","tag-entertainment","tag-espionage","tag-european","tag-france","tag-indian","tag-netherlands","tag-new-zealand","tag-norway","tag-pakistan"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153780"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=153780"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153780\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":153782,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/153780\/revisions\/153782"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=153780"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=153780"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=153780"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}