{"id":157906,"date":"2023-05-18T21:08:17","date_gmt":"2023-05-18T13:08:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=517000"},"modified":"2023-05-18T21:08:17","modified_gmt":"2023-05-18T13:08:17","slug":"vietnam-rebukes-china-philippines-over-south-china-sea-conduct","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2023\/05\/18\/vietnam-rebukes-china-philippines-over-south-china-sea-conduct\/","title":{"rendered":"Vietnam rebukes China, Philippines over South China Sea conduct"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>FILE PHOTO: A ship (right) of Vietnam Marine Guard is seen near a ship of Chinese Coast Guard in the South China Sea, about 210 km (130 miles) off shore of Vietnam May 14, 2014.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>This data comes from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\" title=\"ChinaPulse.com provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring in China\" >ChinaPulse.com media intelligence and smart news insights monitoring platform<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>FILE PHOTO: A ship (right) of Vietnam Marine Guard is seen near a ship of Chinese Coast Guard in the South China Sea, about 210 km (130 miles) off shore of Vietnam May 14, 2014.&#8230;<br \/>\nThis data comes from the ChinaPulse.com media intelligence and smar&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[144,213,586,194],"tags":[3472,7537,2240,10329,3839,10564,3549,3904],"class_list":["post-157906","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-china","category-china-news","category-economy","category-news-chinese-law","tag-chinese","tag-hanoi","tag-military","tag-philippines","tag-south-china-sea","tag-spratly-islands","tag-united-nations","tag-vietnam"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157906","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=157906"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157906\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":157907,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/157906\/revisions\/157907"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=157906"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=157906"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=157906"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}