{"id":158083,"date":"2023-05-19T21:11:24","date_gmt":"2023-05-19T13:11:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=517074"},"modified":"2023-05-19T21:11:24","modified_gmt":"2023-05-19T13:11:24","slug":"china-opposes-g20-meeting-in-indian-rule-kashmir-and-will-skip-it","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2023\/05\/19\/china-opposes-g20-meeting-in-indian-rule-kashmir-and-will-skip-it\/","title":{"rendered":"China opposes G20 meeting in Indian-rule Kashmir and will skip it"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>NEW DELHI, May 19 (Reuters) &#8211; China said on Friday that it is opposed to a G20 tourism meeting next week in the disputed Himalayan territory of Kashmir in India and will not attend.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>This data comes from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\" title=\"ChinaPulse.com provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring in China\" >ChinaPulse.com media intelligence and smart news insights monitoring platform<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>NEW DELHI, May 19 (Reuters) &#8211; China said on Friday that it is opposed to a G20 tourism meeting next week in the disputed Himalayan territory of Kashmir in India and will not attend.&#8230;<br \/>\nThis data comes from the ChinaPulse.com media intelligenc&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65,144,213,931,194,940],"tags":[3472,3450,10353,2240,10364,10325,2961,10349,2107],"class_list":["post-158083","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-beijing","category-china","category-china-news","category-india","category-news-chinese-law","category-tourism","tag-chinese","tag-indian","tag-ladakh","tag-military","tag-muslim","tag-new-delhi","tag-pakistan","tag-peace","tag-religion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/158083","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=158083"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/158083\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":158084,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/158083\/revisions\/158084"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=158083"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=158083"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=158083"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}