{"id":167123,"date":"2023-08-18T14:01:53","date_gmt":"2023-08-18T06:01:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=522061"},"modified":"2023-08-18T14:01:53","modified_gmt":"2023-08-18T06:01:53","slug":"labor-support-for-aukus-never-in-doubt","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2023\/08\/18\/labor-support-for-aukus-never-in-doubt\/","title":{"rendered":"Labor support for AUKUS never in doubt"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The outcome supporting AUKUS in that platform was never in doubt, easily carried on the voices.<\/p>\n<p>Especially for US politicians unfamiliar with the peculiar traditions and pressure points of internal Labor politics, however, the result of the tightly time-limited debate was a useful demonstration of the government\u2019s resolute stance \u2013 now officially endorsed by the whole party.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>This data comes from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\" title=\"ChinaPulse.com provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring in China\" >ChinaPulse.com media intelligence and smart news insights monitoring platform<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The outcome supporting AUKUS in that platform was never in doubt, easily carried on the voices.<br \/>\nEspecially for US politicians unfamiliar with the peculiar traditions and pressure points of internal Labor politics, however, the result of the tightly tim&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[413,65,144,213,477,1607,194,1542,484,1367],"tags":[2210,8755,2086,10320,3686,3472,10321,1696,3312,10342,3556,2724,3836,2240,2172,1977,3402],"class_list":["post-167123","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-advertising","category-beijing","category-china","category-china-news","category-investment","category-manufacturing","category-news-chinese-law","category-technology","category-united-states","category-usa","tag-america","tag-artificial-intelligence","tag-australia","tag-biden","tag-boycott","tag-chinese","tag-communist","tag-congress","tag-electronics","tag-embassy","tag-export","tag-exports","tag-logistics","tag-military","tag-national-security","tag-senate","tag-united-kingdom"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/167123"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=167123"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/167123\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":167124,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/167123\/revisions\/167124"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=167123"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=167123"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=167123"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}