{"id":174564,"date":"2023-12-31T21:00:03","date_gmt":"2023-12-31T13:00:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=530257"},"modified":"2023-12-31T21:00:03","modified_gmt":"2023-12-31T13:00:03","slug":"how-2023-became-the-year-congress-forgot-to-ban-tiktok","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2023\/12\/31\/how-2023-became-the-year-congress-forgot-to-ban-tiktok\/","title":{"rendered":"How 2023 became the year Congress forgot to ban TikTok"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Banning TikTok in the US seemed almost inevitable at the start of 2023. The previous year saw a trickle of legislative actions against the short-form video app, after dozens of individual states barred TikTok from government devices in late 2022 over security concerns.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><strong>This data comes from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\" title=\"ChinaPulse.com provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring for China News\" >ChinaPulse.com media intelligence and smart news insights monitoring platform<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Banning TikTok in the US seemed almost inevitable at the start of 2023. The previous year saw a trickle of legislative actions against the short-form video app, after dozens of individual states barred TikTok from government devices in late 2022 over s&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[928,144,213,113,4,477,194,222,106,465,1542,484],"tags":[8755,3686,10309,3472,10321,1696,10318,10331,3312,3929,10487,2172,1977,8399,10310],"class_list":["post-174564","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-censorship","category-china","category-china-news","category-google","category-internet","category-investment","category-news-chinese-law","category-online-video","category-search-engine","category-social-media","category-technology","category-united-states","tag-artificial-intelligence","tag-boycott","tag-bytedance","tag-chinese","tag-communist","tag-congress","tag-dollar","tag-elections","tag-electronics","tag-espionage","tag-free-speech","tag-national-security","tag-senate","tag-spy","tag-tiktok"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/174564","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=174564"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/174564\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":174567,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/174564\/revisions\/174567"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=174564"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=174564"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=174564"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}