{"id":177039,"date":"2024-01-18T23:35:36","date_gmt":"2024-01-18T15:35:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=531460"},"modified":"2024-01-18T23:35:36","modified_gmt":"2024-01-18T15:35:36","slug":"china-made-drones-pose-significant-risk-to-u-s-data-security-agencies-say","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2024\/01\/18\/china-made-drones-pose-significant-risk-to-u-s-data-security-agencies-say\/","title":{"rendered":"China-made Drones Pose Significant Risk to U.S. Data, Security Agencies Say"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>China-made drones pose a significant risk to American data, critical infrastructure and national security, two federal security agencies said this week in an official cybersecurity guidance urging U.S. professional and hobby users to transition to safer alternatives<\/p>\n<p>The use of Chinese-manufactured unmanned aircraft systems\u2014UAS, or more commonly known as drones\u2014in critical infrastructure &#8220;risks exposing sensitive information to PRC authorities, jeopardizing U.S.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><strong>This data comes from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\" title=\"ChinaPulse.com provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring for China News\" >ChinaPulse.com media intelligence and smart news insights monitoring platform<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>China-made drones pose a significant risk to American data, critical infrastructure and national security, two federal security agencies said this week in an official cybersecurity guidance urging U.S. professional and hobby users to transition to safe&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65,144,213,49,586,529,138,4,288,194],"tags":[2762,2210,8755,6518,6816,10347,3472,10321,3868,7338,5256,1926,8809,2172,8864,10707,10345],"class_list":["post-177039","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-beijing","category-china","category-china-news","category-e-commerce","category-economy","category-fbi","category-guangdong","category-internet","category-medicine","category-news-chinese-law","tag-acquisition","tag-america","tag-artificial-intelligence","tag-aviation","tag-big-data","tag-bri","tag-chinese","tag-communist","tag-cybersecurity","tag-drone","tag-healthcare","tag-made-in-china","tag-manufacturer","tag-national-security","tag-news-media","tag-pentagon","tag-propaganda"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/177039","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=177039"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/177039\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":177040,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/177039\/revisions\/177040"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=177039"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=177039"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=177039"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}