{"id":177895,"date":"2024-01-25T23:05:46","date_gmt":"2024-01-25T15:05:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=531879"},"modified":"2024-01-25T23:05:46","modified_gmt":"2024-01-25T15:05:46","slug":"border-dispute-with-india-doesnt-represent-whole-picture-of-bilateral-ties-china","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2024\/01\/25\/border-dispute-with-india-doesnt-represent-whole-picture-of-bilateral-ties-china\/","title":{"rendered":"Border dispute with India doesn\u2019t represent whole picture of bilateral ties: China"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The boundary dispute with India is a \u201clegacy issue\u201d and it does not represent the whole picture of the bilateral relations, China\u2019s military said on Thursday.<\/p>\n<p>Responding to a question on External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar\u2019s reported statement that China violated the bilateral consensus in 2020 and assembled a large number of military forces along the Line of Actual Control, resulting in the conflict in the Galwan Valley, Chinese Ministry of National Defence spokesperson Senior Colonel Wu Qian told media that China continues to press India to delink the border issue and bilateral relations and work for normalcy.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><strong>This data comes from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\" title=\"ChinaPulse.com provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring for China News\" >ChinaPulse.com media intelligence and smart news insights monitoring platform<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The boundary dispute with India is a \u201clegacy issue\u201d and it does not represent the whole picture of the bilateral relations, China\u2019s military said on Thursday.<br \/>\nResponding to a question on External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar\u2019s reported statement that &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[144,213,931,194],"tags":[10355,3472,3610,3450,10353,2240,10349,6609],"class_list":["post-177895","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-china","category-china-news","category-india","category-news-chinese-law","tag-army","tag-chinese","tag-diplomacy","tag-indian","tag-ladakh","tag-military","tag-peace","tag-pla"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/177895","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=177895"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/177895\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":177896,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/177895\/revisions\/177896"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=177895"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=177895"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=177895"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}