{"id":178701,"date":"2024-02-02T19:38:49","date_gmt":"2024-02-02T11:38:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=532278"},"modified":"2024-02-02T19:38:49","modified_gmt":"2024-02-02T11:38:49","slug":"oil-set-for-weekly-loss-despite-gain-on-opec-output-decision","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2024\/02\/02\/oil-set-for-weekly-loss-despite-gain-on-opec-output-decision\/","title":{"rendered":"Oil set for weekly loss despite gain on OPEC+ output decision"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Oil prices rose on Friday after the OPEC+ group\u2019s decision to keep its production policy unchanged, but benchmarks remained on track for weekly losses on China demand growth fears.<\/p>\n<p>Brent crude futures were up 50 cents, or 0.6 per cent, at $79.20 a barrel by 1001 GMT and U.S.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><strong>This data comes from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\" title=\"ChinaPulse.com provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring for China News\" >ChinaPulse.com media intelligence and smart news insights monitoring platform<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Oil prices rose on Friday after the OPEC+ group\u2019s decision to keep its production policy unchanged, but benchmarks remained on track for weekly losses on China demand growth fears.<br \/>\nBrent crude futures were up 50 cents, or 0.6 per cent, at $79.20 a barr&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[669,144,213,586,873,194,249],"tags":[10725,10726,8707,2240,7571,10451,7004,1788],"class_list":["post-178701","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bank","category-china","category-china-news","category-economy","category-iran","category-news-chinese-law","category-russia","tag-gaza","tag-hamas","tag-israel","tag-military","tag-oil","tag-palestine","tag-shipping","tag-texas"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/178701","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=178701"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/178701\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":178702,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/178701\/revisions\/178702"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=178701"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=178701"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=178701"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}