{"id":179593,"date":"2024-02-09T21:30:37","date_gmt":"2024-02-09T13:30:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=532742"},"modified":"2024-02-09T21:30:37","modified_gmt":"2024-02-09T13:30:37","slug":"poll-are-you-still-using-a-huawei-phone-or-have-you-switched","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2024\/02\/09\/poll-are-you-still-using-a-huawei-phone-or-have-you-switched\/","title":{"rendered":"Poll: Are you still using a HUAWEI phone or have you switched?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Robert Triggs \/ Android Authority<\/p>\n<p>HUAWEI was subjected to a US trade ban back in 2019, and this had plenty of serious ramifications for the company. One of the biggest issues for consumers was that phones released after the trade ban lacked Google integration.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><strong>This data comes from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\" title=\"ChinaPulse.com provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring for China News\" >ChinaPulse.com media intelligence and smart news insights monitoring platform<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Robert Triggs \/ Android Authority<br \/>\nHUAWEI was subjected to a US trade ban back in 2019, and this had plenty of serious ramifications for the company. One of the biggest issues for consumers was that phones released after the trade ban lacked Google inte&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[126,213,113,979,581,194,759,106],"tags":[2005,3686,3472,4765],"class_list":["post-179593","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-apple","category-china-news","category-google","category-huawei","category-iphone","category-news-chinese-law","category-samsung","category-search-engine","tag-android","tag-boycott","tag-chinese","tag-xiaomi"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/179593"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=179593"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/179593\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":179594,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/179593\/revisions\/179594"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=179593"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=179593"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=179593"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}