{"id":181706,"date":"2024-02-25T21:14:33","date_gmt":"2024-02-25T13:14:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=533815"},"modified":"2024-02-25T21:14:33","modified_gmt":"2024-02-25T13:14:33","slug":"balloon-intercepted-over-us-likely-related-to-a-hobby-officials","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2024\/02\/25\/balloon-intercepted-over-us-likely-related-to-a-hobby-officials\/","title":{"rendered":"Balloon intercepted over US likely related to a \u2018hobby\u2019: Officials"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>(The Hill) \u2014 The high-altitude balloon that was intercepted earlier this week over the U.S. was likely a \u201chobby balloon,\u201d officials said Saturday.<\/p>\n<p>The balloon, which flew at an altitude of over 40,000 feet over Utah and Colorado, did not pose a security threat, the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) said in a statement to multiple outlets.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><strong>This data comes from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\" title=\"ChinaPulse.com provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring for China News\" >ChinaPulse.com media intelligence and smart news insights monitoring platform<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>(The Hill) \u2014 The high-altitude balloon that was intercepted earlier this week over the U.S. was likely a \u201chobby balloon,\u201d officials said Saturday.<br \/>\nThe balloon, which flew at an altitude of over 40,000 feet over Utah and Colorado, did not pose a securit&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65,144,213,194,64],"tags":[2210,6518,3472,3929,2240,2172,8399,10336],"class_list":["post-181706","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-beijing","category-china","category-china-news","category-news-chinese-law","category-taiwan","tag-america","tag-aviation","tag-chinese","tag-espionage","tag-military","tag-national-security","tag-spy","tag-washington"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/181706","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=181706"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/181706\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":181707,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/181706\/revisions\/181707"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=181706"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=181706"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=181706"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}