{"id":186965,"date":"2024-04-06T19:08:39","date_gmt":"2024-04-06T11:08:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=536526"},"modified":"2024-04-06T19:08:39","modified_gmt":"2024-04-06T11:08:39","slug":"bose-was-indias-first-prime-minister-is-she-right","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2024\/04\/06\/bose-was-indias-first-prime-minister-is-she-right\/","title":{"rendered":"Bose was India\u2019s first prime minister. Is she right?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Kangana Ranaut, in a recent interview, claimed that Subhas Chandra Bose, not Jawaharlal Nehru, was the first prime minister of independent India. After being criticised for the historicity (or lack thereof) of her comments, Kangana doubled down, citing the provisional government setup by Bose in 1943 as evidence of her claim.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><strong>This data comes from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\" title=\"ChinaPulse.com provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring for China News\" >ChinaPulse.com media intelligence and smart news insights monitoring platform<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kangana Ranaut, in a recent interview, claimed that Subhas Chandra Bose, not Jawaharlal Nehru, was the first prime minister of independent India. After being criticised for the historicity (or lack thereof) of her comments, Kangana doubled down, citing&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[413,639,144,213,325,671,931,693,194],"tags":[10401,10355,8493,3472,10338,2274,5998,7654,3571,3450,3574,2240,10448,10364,3902,10329,1816,10345],"class_list":["post-186965","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-advertising","category-california","category-china","category-china-news","category-education","category-finance","category-india","category-japan","category-news-chinese-law","tag-afghanistan","tag-army","tag-britain","tag-chinese","tag-democracy","tag-entertainment","tag-expat","tag-france","tag-germany","tag-indian","tag-italy","tag-military","tag-modi","tag-muslim","tag-myanmar","tag-philippines","tag-prison","tag-propaganda"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/186965","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=186965"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/186965\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":186966,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/186965\/revisions\/186966"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=186965"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=186965"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=186965"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}