{"id":188547,"date":"2024-04-20T18:08:00","date_gmt":"2024-04-20T10:08:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=537524"},"modified":"2024-04-20T18:08:00","modified_gmt":"2024-04-20T10:08:00","slug":"gentlemans-agreement-with-china-harmful-to-ph-interests-constitution","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2024\/04\/20\/gentlemans-agreement-with-china-harmful-to-ph-interests-constitution\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018Gentleman\u2019s agreement\u2019 with China harmful to PH interests, Constitution"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;If there is any such agreement, it is the responsibility of those responsible for it to explain it before the Filipino people but it is not and will never be binding upon this administration,&#8217; says National Security Adviser Eduardo A\u00f1o<\/p>\n<p>MANILA, Philippines \u2013 If proven true, the so-called \u201cgentleman\u2019s agreement\u201d between former president Rodrigo Duterte and China is harmful to Philippine interests and the Constitution, National Security Adviser (NSA) Eduardo A\u00f1o said on Saturday, April 20.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><strong>This data comes from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\" title=\"ChinaPulse.com provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring for China News\" >ChinaPulse.com media intelligence and smart news insights monitoring platform<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This is AI generated summarization, which may have errors. For context, always refer to the full article.<br \/>\n'If there is any such agreement, it is the responsibility of those responsible for it to explain it before the Filipino people but it is not&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[144,213,586,194],"tags":[3472,10449,10342,10450,2240,2172,10322,10329,10345,1977],"class_list":["post-188547","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-china","category-china-news","category-economy","category-news-chinese-law","tag-chinese","tag-duterte","tag-embassy","tag-manila","tag-military","tag-national-security","tag-navy","tag-philippines","tag-propaganda","tag-senate"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188547","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=188547"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188547\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":188548,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188547\/revisions\/188548"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=188547"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=188547"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=188547"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}