{"id":194032,"date":"2024-06-21T07:53:04","date_gmt":"2024-06-20T23:53:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=540620"},"modified":"2024-06-21T07:53:04","modified_gmt":"2024-06-20T23:53:04","slug":"bytedance-alleges-uss-singling-out-of-tiktok-is-unconstitutional","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2024\/06\/21\/bytedance-alleges-uss-singling-out-of-tiktok-is-unconstitutional\/","title":{"rendered":"ByteDance alleges US\u2019s \u2018singling out of TikTok\u2019 is unconstitutional"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>New legal filings from the Chinese tech firm ByteDance have challenged the US government\u2019s \u201cunconstitutional singling out of TikTok\u201d, revealing fresh details about failed negotiations over a potential ban of the platform.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><strong>This data comes from the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\" title=\"ChinaPulse.com provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring for China News\" >ChinaPulse.com media intelligence and smart news insights monitoring platform<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>New legal filings from the Chinese tech firm ByteDance have challenged the US government\u2019s \u201cunconstitutional singling out of TikTok\u201d, revealing fresh details about failed negotiations over a potential ban of the platform.&#8230;<br \/>\nThis data comes from th&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[126,144,213,113,4,194,222,106,465,78,1542,484],"tags":[10320,3686,10309,3472,1696,10331,3929,10487,2172,8399,10310],"class_list":["post-194032","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-apple","category-china","category-china-news","category-google","category-internet","category-news-chinese-law","category-online-video","category-search-engine","category-social-media","category-software","category-technology","category-united-states","tag-biden","tag-boycott","tag-bytedance","tag-chinese","tag-congress","tag-elections","tag-espionage","tag-free-speech","tag-national-security","tag-spy","tag-tiktok"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/194032"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=194032"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/194032\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":194033,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/194032\/revisions\/194033"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=194032"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=194032"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=194032"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}