{"id":27467,"date":"2014-12-10T05:03:10","date_gmt":"2014-12-09T21:03:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/?guid=5ceacba19b4b1e88389fc874b91db43d"},"modified":"2014-12-10T05:03:10","modified_gmt":"2014-12-09T21:03:10","slug":"dueling-position-papers-on-the-south-china-sea","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2014\/12\/10\/dueling-position-papers-on-the-south-china-sea\/","title":{"rendered":"Dueling position papers on the South China Sea"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div><p>On Saturday I <a href=\"http:\/\/lawprofessors.typepad.com\/china_law_prof_blog\/2014\/12\/china-sets-forth-its-position-in-the-south-china-sea-dispute-with-the-philippines.html\" >posted links to position papers by both China and the US<\/a> on China&#039;s South China Sea claims. Here&#039;s <a href=\"http:\/\/cogitasia.com\/beijings-and-washingtons-dueling-south-china-sea-papers\/\" >an analysis of the dueling papers<\/a>.<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On Saturday I posted links to position papers by both China and the US on China's South China Sea claims. Here's an analysis of the dueling papers.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[192,194],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-27467","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-commentary","category-news-chinese-law"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27467","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27467"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27467\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27468,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27467\/revisions\/27468"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27467"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27467"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27467"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}