{"id":27822,"date":"2014-12-31T14:30:22","date_gmt":"2014-12-31T06:30:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/twitter-550177121721913344-post"},"modified":"2014-12-31T14:30:22","modified_gmt":"2014-12-31T06:30:22","slug":"controversial-new-fares-barely-dent-beijing-subway","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2014\/12\/31\/controversial-new-fares-barely-dent-beijing-subway\/","title":{"rendered":"Controversial New Fares Barely Dent Beijing Subway\u2026"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Controversial New Fares Barely Dent Beijing Subway Swarm | Wall St Journal <a href=\"http:\/\/on.wsj.com\/1tzoB0G\">on.wsj.com\/1tzoB0G<\/a> &#8212; of course; commuters don&#8217;t have options<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><small>\u00a9 @chinahearsay for <a href=\"http:\/\/www.chinahearsay.com\/\">China Hearsay<\/a>, 2014. |\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.chinahearsay.com\/controversial-new-fares-barely-dent-beijing-subway\/\">Permalink<\/a> |\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.chinahearsay.com\/controversial-new-fares-barely-dent-beijing-subway\/#comments\">No comment<\/a> |\nAdd to\n<a href=\"http:\/\/del.icio.us\/post?url=http:\/\/www.chinahearsay.com\/controversial-new-fares-barely-dent-beijing-subway\/&title=Controversial%20New%20Fares%20Barely%20Dent%20Beijing%20Subway&#8230;\">del.icio.us<\/a>\n<br\/>\nPost tags: <br\/>\n<\/small><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Controversial New Fares Barely Dent Beijing Subway Swarm | Wall St Journal on.wsj.com\/1tzoB0G &mdash; of course; commuters don&rsquo;t have options &copy; @chinahearsay for China Hearsay, 2014. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us Post tags:<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":159,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[194],"tags":[3542],"class_list":["post-27822","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news-chinese-law","tag-short-takes"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27822","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/159"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27822"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27822\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27823,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27822\/revisions\/27823"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27822"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27822"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27822"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}