{"id":38817,"date":"2020-10-28T22:47:00","date_gmt":"2020-10-28T14:47:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=125821"},"modified":"2020-10-28T22:47:00","modified_gmt":"2020-10-28T14:47:00","slug":"we-must-not-underwrite-the-chinese-communist-partys-technologically-enhanced-totalitarianism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2020\/10\/28\/we-must-not-underwrite-the-chinese-communist-partys-technologically-enhanced-totalitarianism\/","title":{"rendered":"We must not underwrite the Chinese Communist Party\u2019s \u201ctechnologically enhanced totalitarianism\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Deputy National Security Advisor Matthew Pottinger, who is arguably the U.S. government\u2019s most knowledgeable expert on the Chinese Communist Party, recently spoke in Mandarin to the people of China and others threatened by what he calls the technologically-enhanced totalitarianism of Xi Jinping\u2019s regime.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>This news comes via <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\"  title=\"Best source for Chinese news in English\">ChinaPulse.com, which delivers news, data, analysis, and insights on Chinese business, travel, finance, health, military, investment, and technology<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Deputy National Security Advisor Matthew Pottinger, who is arguably the U.S. government\u2019s most knowledgeable expert on the Chinese Communist Party, recently spoke in Mandarin to the people of China and others threatened by what he calls the technologic&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[144,213,194,1542],"tags":[3472,10321,2172,1977,10336],"class_list":["post-38817","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-china","category-china-news","category-news-chinese-law","category-technology","tag-chinese","tag-communist","tag-national-security","tag-senate","tag-washington"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38817","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38817"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38817\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":38818,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38817\/revisions\/38818"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38817"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38817"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38817"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}