{"id":38825,"date":"2020-10-28T22:18:00","date_gmt":"2020-10-28T14:18:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=125777"},"modified":"2020-10-28T22:18:00","modified_gmt":"2020-10-28T14:18:00","slug":"twitters-explanation-about-showing-ladakh-in-china-inadequate-joint-parliamentary-panel","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2020\/10\/28\/twitters-explanation-about-showing-ladakh-in-china-inadequate-joint-parliamentary-panel\/","title":{"rendered":"Twitter\u2019s Explanation About Showing Ladakh in China Inadequate: Joint Parliamentary Panel"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Twitter\u2019s explanations on being questioned by the Joint Parliamentary Committee on Personal Data Protection Bill about showing Ladakh as part of China were inadequate and its actions amounts to criminal offence attracting imprisonment of seven years, committee chairman Meenakshi Lekhi said on Wednesday.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>This news comes via <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\"  title=\"Best source for Chinese news in English\">ChinaPulse.com, which delivers news, data, analysis, and insights on Chinese business, travel, finance, health, military, investment, and technology<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Twitter\u2019s explanations on being questioned by the Joint Parliamentary Committee on Personal Data Protection Bill about showing Ladakh as part of China were inadequate and its actions amounts to criminal offence attracting imprisonment of seven years, c&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[126,144,213,113,931,581,194,106,465,1542,1242],"tags":[3312,10353],"class_list":["post-38825","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-apple","category-china","category-china-news","category-google","category-india","category-iphone","category-news-chinese-law","category-search-engine","category-social-media","category-technology","category-twitter","tag-electronics","tag-ladakh"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38825","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38825"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38825\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":38826,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38825\/revisions\/38826"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38825"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38825"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38825"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}