{"id":44599,"date":"2020-11-08T22:59:02","date_gmt":"2020-11-08T14:59:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=130729"},"modified":"2020-11-08T22:59:02","modified_gmt":"2020-11-08T14:59:02","slug":"lac-border-standoff-india-china-agree-to-disengage-from-some-of-the-friction-points-says-report","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2020\/11\/08\/lac-border-standoff-india-china-agree-to-disengage-from-some-of-the-friction-points-says-report\/","title":{"rendered":"LAC Border standoff: India, China agree to disengage from \u2018some of the friction points\u2019, says report"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>After the standoff that lasted more than six months in eastern Ladakh, it seems India and China are close to a breakthrough over disengagement on the Line of Actual Control (LAC), news agency ANI reported quoting defence sources. The development is in the process after the eight-round of Corps Commander level talks between the two sides held on November 6 in Chushul.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>This news comes via <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\"  title=\"Best source for Chinese news in English\">ChinaPulse.com, which delivers news, data, analysis, and insights on Chinese business, travel, finance, health, military, investment, and technology<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>After the standoff that lasted more than six months in eastern Ladakh, it seems India and China are close to a breakthrough over disengagement on the Line of Actual Control (LAC), news agency ANI reported quoting defence sources. The development is in &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[144,213,931,194],"tags":[10353],"class_list":["post-44599","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-china","category-china-news","category-india","category-news-chinese-law","tag-ladakh"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44599"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=44599"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44599\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":44602,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44599\/revisions\/44602"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=44599"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=44599"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=44599"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}