{"id":45076,"date":"2020-11-09T23:00:01","date_gmt":"2020-11-09T15:00:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=131073"},"modified":"2020-11-09T23:00:01","modified_gmt":"2020-11-09T15:00:01","slug":"china-says-inclusion-of-taiwan-in-who-meeting-would-be-illegal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2020\/11\/09\/china-says-inclusion-of-taiwan-in-who-meeting-would-be-illegal\/","title":{"rendered":"China says inclusion of Taiwan in WHO meeting would be \u2018illegal\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>GENEVA (Reuters) &#8211; China&#8217;s ambassador to the U.N. in Geneva Chen Xu told a World Health Organization (WHO) ministerial meeting on Monday that a proposal to include Taiwan as an observer was &#8220;illegal and invalid&#8221; as it violated the principle of &#8220;One China&#8221;.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>This news comes via <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\"  title=\"Best source for Chinese news in English\">ChinaPulse.com, which delivers news, data, analysis, and insights on Chinese business, travel, finance, health, military, investment, and technology<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>GENEVA (Reuters) &#8211; China's ambassador to the U.N. in Geneva Chen Xu told a World Health Organization (WHO) ministerial meeting on Monday that a proposal to include Taiwan as an observer was \"illegal and invalid\" as it violated t&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[144,213,288,194,64,484,296],"tags":[10324,10342,10455,10328],"class_list":["post-45076","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-china","category-china-news","category-medicine","category-news-chinese-law","category-taiwan","category-united-states","category-world-health-organization","tag-covid-19","tag-embassy","tag-geneva","tag-pandemic"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45076"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=45076"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45076\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":45077,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45076\/revisions\/45077"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=45076"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=45076"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=45076"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}