{"id":49719,"date":"2020-11-18T23:02:59","date_gmt":"2020-11-18T15:02:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=135423"},"modified":"2020-11-18T23:02:59","modified_gmt":"2020-11-18T15:02:59","slug":"twitter-apologises-in-writing-for-ladakh-in-china-error","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2020\/11\/18\/twitter-apologises-in-writing-for-ladakh-in-china-error\/","title":{"rendered":"Twitter apologises in writing for 'Ladakh in China' error"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Twitter apologises in writing for &#8216;Ladakh in China&#8217; error Twitter apologises in writing for &#8216;Ladakh in China&#8217; error 18th November 2020 07:32 pm Deccan Herald Shemin Joy,<\/p>\n<p>Apologising for wrongly showing Ladakh in China, Twitter has written to a Parliamentary panel promising to correct the error by month-end.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>This news comes via <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\"  title=\"Best source for Chinese news in English\">ChinaPulse.com, which delivers news, data, analysis, and insights on Chinese business, travel, finance, health, military, investment, and technology<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Twitter apologises in writing for 'Ladakh in China' error Twitter apologises in writing for 'Ladakh in China' error 18th November 2020 07:32 pm Deccan Herald Shemin Joy,<br \/>\nApologising for wrongly showing Ladakh in China, Twitter h&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[144,213,931,194,465,1242],"tags":[1804,3450,10353],"class_list":["post-49719","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-china","category-china-news","category-india","category-news-chinese-law","category-social-media","category-twitter","tag-computer","tag-indian","tag-ladakh"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49719"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=49719"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49719\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":49720,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49719\/revisions\/49720"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=49719"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=49719"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=49719"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}