{"id":50945,"date":"2020-11-25T14:55:35","date_gmt":"2020-11-25T06:55:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.mediaintel.asia\/?p=154312"},"modified":"2020-11-25T14:55:35","modified_gmt":"2020-11-25T06:55:35","slug":"china-opposes-indian-bans-of-its-mobile-apps","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2020\/11\/25\/china-opposes-indian-bans-of-its-mobile-apps\/","title":{"rendered":"China opposes Indian bans of its mobile apps"},"content":{"rendered":"<div align=\"center\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.mediaintel.asia\/\" title=\"MediaIntel.Asia provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring in Asia\" ><img src=\"https:\/\/www.mediaintel.asia\/wp-content\/uploads\/mediaintelasia-logo-blackyellow-400x300-1.png\" border=\"0\"><\/a><\/div>\n<p>BEIJING (Reuters) - China resolutely opposes India's measures to ban more Chinese mobile applications over national security concerns, its embassy in the South Asian nation said on Wednesday.<br \/>\nIndia banned 43 of the apps on Tuesday, including Alibaba Group Holding Ltd's e-commerce app Aliexpress, in a new wave of web sanctions targeting China after the neighbours' months-long standoff on their Himalayan border.<br \/>\n(Reporting by Lusha Zhang and Brenda Goh; Editing by Clarence Fernandez) On Air Now<\/p>\n<p>This data comes from <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mediaintel.asia\/\" title=\"MediaIntel.Asia provides Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring in Asia\" >MediaIntel.Asia's Media Intelligence and Media Monitoring Platform<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>BEIJING (Reuters) &#8211; China resolutely opposes India's measures to ban more Chinese mobile applications over national security concerns, its embassy in the South Asian nation said on Wednesday.<br \/>\nIndia banned 43 of the apps on Tuesday, including Alibaba G&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":253,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[46,65,144,49,931,30,194,493],"tags":[3686,6601,3472,10342,3450,2172,10332],"class_list":["post-50945","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-alibaba","category-beijing","category-china","category-e-commerce","category-india","category-mobile","category-news-chinese-law","category-online-shopping","tag-boycott","tag-china-technology","tag-chinese","tag-embassy","tag-indian","tag-national-security","tag-sanctions"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50945","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/253"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=50945"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50945\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":50946,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50945\/revisions\/50946"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=50945"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=50945"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=50945"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}