{"id":51086,"date":"2020-11-27T22:56:00","date_gmt":"2020-11-27T14:56:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=139579"},"modified":"2020-11-27T22:56:00","modified_gmt":"2020-11-27T14:56:00","slug":"the-usd-4-2bn-question-has-china-dumped-plustoken-bitcoin-ethereum-co","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2020\/11\/27\/the-usd-4-2bn-question-has-china-dumped-plustoken-bitcoin-ethereum-co\/","title":{"rendered":"The USD 4.2bn Question: Has China \u2018Dumped\u2019 PlusToken Bitcoin, Ethereum &amp; Co?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Share Source: Adobe\/\u0410\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0441\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0440 \u041a\u043e\u043b\u0438\u043a\u043e\u0432<\/p>\n<p>Crypto community members are wondering what has become of a huge stash of crypto worth a combined USD 4.2bn seized by the Chinese authorities who closed down the PlusToken crypto scam earlier this year \u2013 with some asking if the funds were already \u201cdumped\u201d onto the market months ago, and others suggesting the state may still be holding onto the funds.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>This news comes via <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\"  title=\"Best source for Chinese news in English\">ChinaPulse.com, which delivers news, data, analysis, and insights on Chinese business, travel, finance, health, military, investment, and technology<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Share Source: Adobe\/\u0410\u043b\u0435\u043a\u0441\u0430\u043d\u0434\u0440 \u041a\u043e\u043b\u0438\u043a\u043e\u0432<br \/>\nCrypto community members are wondering what has become of a huge stash of crypto worth a combined USD 4.2bn seized by the Chinese authorities who closed down the PlusToken crypto scam earlier this year \u2013 with some &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[65,144,213,671,137,872,4,693,194,1108,465,1542,1242],"tags":[5567,7705,3472,10333,10209,6823],"class_list":["post-51086","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-beijing","category-china","category-china-news","category-finance","category-fraud","category-hacker","category-internet","category-japan","category-news-chinese-law","category-police","category-social-media","category-technology","category-twitter","tag-bitcoin","tag-blockchain","tag-chinese","tag-crypto","tag-ethereum","tag-fintech"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51086"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=51086"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51086\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":51087,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51086\/revisions\/51087"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=51086"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=51086"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=51086"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}