{"id":51816,"date":"2020-11-28T23:04:00","date_gmt":"2020-11-28T15:04:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=140165"},"modified":"2020-11-28T23:04:00","modified_gmt":"2020-11-28T15:04:00","slug":"chinese-police-have-seized-4-2-billion-cryptos-from-plustoken-ponzi-crackdown","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2020\/11\/28\/chinese-police-have-seized-4-2-billion-cryptos-from-plustoken-ponzi-crackdown\/","title":{"rendered":"Chinese Police Have Seized $4.2 Billion Cryptos from PlusToken Ponzi Crackdown"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Crypto assets worth more than $4.2 billion have been seized by Chinese police during the massive PlusToken Ponzi scheme crackdown, according to a new court ruling. From a report: In a November 19 judgment made public on Thursday, the Jiangsu Yancheng Intermediate People&#8217;s Court has detailed the breakdown for the first time of all the crypto assets seized by Chinese police related to the PlusToken case.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>This news comes via <a href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\"  title=\"Best source for Chinese news in English\">ChinaPulse.com, which delivers news, data, analysis, and insights on Chinese business, travel, finance, health, military, investment, and technology<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Crypto assets worth more than $4.2 billion have been seized by Chinese police during the massive PlusToken Ponzi scheme crackdown, according to a new court ruling. From a report: In a November 19 judgment made public on Thursday, the Jiangsu Yancheng I&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[144,213,1511,194,1108],"tags":[5567,7705,3472,10333,6823],"class_list":["post-51816","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-china","category-china-news","category-jiangsu","category-news-chinese-law","category-police","tag-bitcoin","tag-blockchain","tag-chinese","tag-crypto","tag-fintech"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51816","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=51816"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51816\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":51817,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51816\/revisions\/51817"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=51816"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=51816"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=51816"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}