{"id":68827,"date":"2021-01-15T23:36:00","date_gmt":"2021-01-15T15:36:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/?p=161094"},"modified":"2021-01-15T23:36:00","modified_gmt":"2021-01-15T15:36:00","slug":"xiaomi-designated-a-communist-chinese-military-company-by-u-s-government","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/2021\/01\/15\/xiaomi-designated-a-communist-chinese-military-company-by-u-s-government\/","title":{"rendered":"Xiaomi designated a 'Communist Chinese military company' by U.S. government"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>15 comments What just happened? As Donald Trump approaches the end of his term, the president is putting the pressure on a Chinese giant\u2014but this time, it&#8217;s not Huawei. The outgoing administration has designated Xiaomi, the world&#8217;s third best-selling phone maker, a &#8216;Communist Chinese military company,&#8217; adding it to a blacklist that could force U.S.&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>The post <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/data-news\/2021\/01\/15\/xiaomi-designated-a-communist-chinese-military-company-by-u-s-government\/\">Xiaomi designated a &#039;Communist Chinese military company&#039; by U.S. government<\/a> appeared first on <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\">ChinaPulse.com<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>15 comments What just happened? As Donald Trump approaches the end of his term, the president is putting the pressure on a Chinese giant\u2014but this time, it\u2019s not Huawei. The outgoing administration has designated Xiaomi, the world\u2019s third best-selling phone maker, a \u2018Communist Chinese military company,\u2019 adding it to a blacklist that could force U.S.\u2026<\/p>\n<p>The post <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/data-news\/2021\/01\/15\/xiaomi-designated-a-communist-chinese-military-company-by-u-s-government\/\">Xiaomi designated a 'Communist Chinese military company' by U.S. government<\/a> appeared first on <a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.chinapulse.com\/\">ChinaPulse.com<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":250,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[213,113,979,477,194,759,106,133,642],"tags":[10355,10320,3686,3472,10321,3544,2240,6609,4765],"class_list":["post-68827","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-china-news","category-google","category-huawei","category-investment","category-news-chinese-law","category-samsung","category-search-engine","category-smartphone","category-smic","tag-army","tag-biden","tag-boycott","tag-chinese","tag-communist","tag-donald-trump","tag-military","tag-pla","tag-xiaomi"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68827"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/250"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68827"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68827\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":68828,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68827\/revisions\/68828"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68827"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68827"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.chinalegalblog.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68827"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}